#PEDESTRIAN HIT BY CAR CALIFORNIA DRIVERS#
#PEDESTRIAN HIT BY CAR CALIFORNIA DRIVER#
#PEDESTRIAN HIT BY CAR CALIFORNIA PLUS#

The speed limit is 30 mph, but drivers frequently exceed that speed while they weave dangerously around other drivers and pedestrians.

#PEDESTRIAN HIT BY CAR CALIFORNIA PLUS#

There are two lanes each way for cars, plus street parking on both sides (but no protected bike lanes). Just look at the area where Ferrara was hit. Lyndale is a dangerous place to be a pedestrian. But of course, itвЂ™s not really the poor coverage that is the cause of their anger-itвЂ™s the poor street design that leads to these tragedies. Since its publication, the article has been sharply criticized online by Twin Cities proponents of safer streets. Walsh said he is planning a follow-up to this initial article but did not provide further details about the crash or his reporting.) Did the police not bother to find out, did Walsh not find it important enough to report, or did the Star Tribune remove the information in the editing/publishing process? (Elder did not respond to requests for comments.

#PEDESTRIAN HIT BY CAR CALIFORNIA DRIVER#

So why does this article omit any information about the driverвЂ™s compliance with the law? Was the driver distracted? Were they obeying the speed limit, or did they exceed the limit by enough to make the collision fatal? We donвЂ™t know. Because Ferrara wasnвЂ™t following the law perfectly at the time of the incident, they load him up with responsibility for his own death. Here is the crux of the articleвЂ™s car-friendly reporting, and police-spokesman ElderвЂ™s anti-pedestrian attitude.

вЂњFerrara was вЂcrossing midblockвЂ™ while others with him were вЂholding their hands up to stop traffic,вЂ™ Elder saidвЂ¦.While expressing sympathy for those who knew the man, Elder also said the circumstances of this death вЂboil down to us reminding people to utilize traffic control devices and cross in crosswalks.вЂ™вЂќ Yet, for complying with the law after running over another human being, the article continues to portray the driver as blameless. To do otherwise would have been a hit-and-run. This is, of course, what the driver was required to do by law. вЂњThe driver stopped immediately and вЂwas fully cooperative,вЂ™ said police spokesman John Elder.вЂќ This reporting separates the driver from their vehicle of destruction. The writing reads like an account of a rogue driverless vehicle. вЂњThe vehicle couldnвЂ™t stop and hit Ferrara.вЂќ вЂњA man who was run over by a vehicle last weekend while crossing in the middle of a south Minneapolis street has died,вЂќ writes Walsh. Take the reporting of Paul Walsh in the Star Tribune (whose coverage of similar instances has been contested previously): Coverage never fails to mention the victimвЂ™s flouting of the law when they crossed the street at the wrong place, or their recklessness when they chose not to wear a helmet. The bulk of the responsibility is instead heaped on the maimed or deceased. Any mention of deadly street design is out of the question. These stories tend to portray drivers as unlucky participants in tragic accidents, rather than active agents in frequently fatal collisions. Unfortunately, coverage of tragedies that are bound to happen on streets like Lyndale continue to avoid addressing the root cause of the problem. The street is designed to accommodate cars to the detriment of every person (driver and non-driver alike) who uses it. Ferrara, died from his injuries.ДЇerrara is far from the first pedestrian seriously injured on Lyndale. Last weekend, a car driver ran over a man trying to do what should have been the simplest of tasks: crossing the street.

Pedestrian hit by car california